In re Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Smith

12 A.D.2d 930, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12831

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 930 (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Smith, 12 A.D.2d 930, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

It appears that on November 4, 1960, this attorney was convicted in the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, County of New York, of certain misdemeanors, to wit: violating section 273 of the Penal Law and of conspiracy to violate said section, in that, while representing certain defendants about to be sentenced in said court for violating section 974 of the Penal Law (relating to gambling, lottery and “policy” wagers), he deceived the court by stating that such defendants had no prior criminal record when he knew that they did, since he had previously represented them. The attorney now submits his resignation as an attorney and counselor at law. The resignation is accepted; his name is ordered to be struck from the roll of attorneys. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appears that on November 4, 1960, this attorney was convicted in the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, County of New York, of certain misdemeanors, to wit: violating section 273 of the Penal Law and of conspiracy to violate said section, in that, while representing certain defendants about to be sentenced in said court for violating section 974 of the Penal Law (relating to gambling, lottery and “policy” wagers), he deceived the court by stating that such defendants had no prior criminal record when he knew that they did, since he had previously represented them. The attorney now submits his resignation as an attorney and counselor at law. The resignation is accepted; his name is ordered to be struck from the roll of attorneys. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 930, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-nyappdiv-1961.