In re Smith
235 A.D. 849
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 A.D. 733 →
Opinion
Motion granted, respondent disbarred and his name ordered struck from the roll of attorneys. Respondent’s course of conduct in connection with the Hartt and Davis real estate and mortgage transactions shows that he is unfit to remain a member of the bar. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Smith, 235 A.D. 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
235 A.D. 849 (In re Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.