In re Smith

185 A.2d 21, 38 N.J. 402, 1962 N.J. LEXIS 182
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 5, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 A.2d 21 (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Smith, 185 A.2d 21, 38 N.J. 402, 1962 N.J. LEXIS 182 (N.J. 1962).

Opinion

'The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

We have carefully considered the testimony and the report of the Ethics Committee in this matter, as well as the sympathetic exposition made by the Committee on oral argument before us, and do not feel in view of all the circumstances that the case is one warranting disciplinary action.

For dismissal — Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.

Opposed — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Congdon
185 A.2d 21 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A.2d 21, 38 N.J. 402, 1962 N.J. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-nj-1962.