In re Smith
185 A.2d 21, 38 N.J. 402, 1962 N.J. LEXIS 182
Opinion
'The opinion of the court was delivered
We have carefully considered the testimony and the report of the Ethics Committee in this matter, as well as the sympathetic exposition made by the Committee on oral argument before us, and do not feel in view of all the circumstances that the case is one warranting disciplinary action.
For dismissal — Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.
Opposed — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Smith, 185 A.2d 21, 38 N.J. 402, 1962 N.J. LEXIS 182 (N.J. 1962).
185 A.2d 21 (In re Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Congdon
185 A.2d 21 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)