In re Smith
This text of In re Smith (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 88A16
Filed 17 March 2017 IN THE MATTER OF TOMMIE JUNIOR SMITH, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 785 S.E.2d 111 (2016), dismissing an appeal
from a decision and order filed on 7 May 2015 by the North Carolina Industrial
Commission and remanding the matter to the Commission for transfer to the
Superior Court, Wake County, under N.C.G.S. § 1-267.1(a1). On 9 June 2016, the
Supreme Court allowed the State’s petition for discretionary review of additional
issues. Heard in the Supreme Court on 13 February 2017.
UNC Center for Civil Rights, by Elizabeth Haddix and Mark Dorosin; and Pressly, Thomas & Conley, PA, by Edwin A. Pressly, for claimant- appellant/appellee.
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, and Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellant/appellee State of North Carolina.
PER CURIAM. IN RE SMITH
Opinion of the Court
For the reasons stated in In re Redmond, ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Mar. 17,
2017) (No. 86A16), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this case is
remanded to the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-nc-2017.