in Re Smith
This text of in Re Smith (in Re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 30, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161058 & (33)(55)(58)(64)(65) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra In re SMITH Richard H. Bernstein _________________________________________ Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices STACEY R. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 161058 COA: 352572 Kent CC: 20-000224-AS JOHN BEASON and CHRISTOPHER BECKER, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for miscellaneous relief are DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 30, 2020 t0622 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-mich-2020.