In re Smith

21 La. Ann. 183
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1869
DocketNo. 2134
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 La. Ann. 183 (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Smith, 21 La. Ann. 183 (La. 1869).

Opinion

Howell, J.

W. 'S. Peterkin, a third party, has appealed by petition from a judgment of the Parish Court of West Feliciana, homolo-gating the account^ filed by J- W. Smith, tutor, of his tutorship of his children, Mary M., Wm. P. and Courtland B. Smith, issue of his marriage with his deceased wife, Mrs. Rebecca G. Smith.

A motion to dismiss is based on the grounds:

First — That Collins & Leake and C. B. Collins, whose accounts were allowed by the judgment of homologation, and who have an interest in maintaining said judgment, have not been cited.

Second — That an appeal should not he allowed to third parties when other evidence than is included in the record is necessary.

The first ground is well taken; for if the judgment be reversed, the claims of Collins & Leake and of C. B. Collins may he opposed and rejected or reduced. The fact, as alleged, that they have been paid, does not necessarily conclude parties interested from contesting the correctness of the amounts so paid. They have an interest in maintaining the judgment as rendered. See succession of McCausland recently decided, also succession of Weigel.

Appeal dismissed at the costs of appellant.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Succession of Guillebert
41 So. 654 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 La. Ann. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-la-1869.