In re Smith Engineering Co.

Ninth Circuit

In re Smith Engineering Co.

107 F.2d 1021, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2930

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 18, 1939

DocketNo. 9343

StatusPublished

This text of 107 F.2d 1021 (In re Smith Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Smith Engineering Co., 107 F.2d 1021, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2930 (9th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition of Sterling M. Wood, that he and his associates be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record, and it appearing from said petition that the petitioner has assigned its right and interest in the subject matter of this litigation, and the assignee, J. B. Swartz, desiring that this matter be dismissed, ordered petition to withdraw granted, that the order to show cause heretofore issued be discharged and the petition for mandamus be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition of Sterling M. Wood, that he and his associates be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record, and it appearing from said petition that the petitioner has assigned its right and interest in the subject matter of this litigation, and the assignee, J. B. Swartz, desiring that this matter be dismissed, ordered petition to withdraw granted, that the order to show cause heretofore issued be discharged and the petition for mandamus be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 F.2d 1021, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-engineering-co-ca9-1939.