Home/California Court of Appeal/In re Smith

In re Smith

112 P.2d 774, 44 Cal. App. 2d 932, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 1093
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 28, 1941
DocketCrim. No. 1762
StatusPublished

This text of 112 P.2d 774 (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Smith, 112 P.2d 774, 44 Cal. App. 2d 932, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 1093 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Under the authority of the opinion filed this day, In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on Behalf of Boyd Coon, Steve Daduk, Howard Edmonds, Goodman Brudney, Earl Kinna, Clarence Vicklund, Alan Fite, Ramon Durem, Herbert Naboisek, Frances Schultz, Estelle Fels, Harriet Hoffman, Estelle Cochran, Ida Pollack and Merle Reese, Criminal No. 1761 [ante, p. 531 (112 Pac. (2d) 767)], the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and petitioner remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coon
112 P.2d 767 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 P.2d 774, 44 Cal. App. 2d 932, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-calctapp-1941.