In Re Smith
This text of In Re Smith (In Re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE IAN D. SMITH ____________________
2012-1344 (Serial No. 11/890,109) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN LOUIS CORDANI, Carmody & Torrance LLP, of New Haven, Connecticut, argued for appellant. Of counsel was FATIMA LAHNIN.
MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 20, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-cafc-2012.