In Re: Smith-Bey

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 2011
Docket10-1980
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Smith-Bey (In Re: Smith-Bey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Smith-Bey, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1980

In Re: JASON J. SMITH-BEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:09-cv-00746)

Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 3, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason J. Smith-Bey, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jason J. Smith-Bey petitions for a writ of mandamus,

asking this court to order the district court to direct service

of his civil rights complaint on the defendants named therein.

Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the

district court directed service of process on September 20,

2010, and that service was effectuated shortly thereafter.

Accordingly, because the district court has taken the action

Smith-Bey seeks, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Smith-Bey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-bey-ca4-2011.