In re Small

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Small

915 So. 2d 353, 2005 La. LEXIS 2481, 2005 WL 3179711

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 29, 2005

DocketNo. 2005-B-1822

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 915 So. 2d 353 (In re Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Small, 915 So. 2d 353, 2005 La. LEXIS 2481, 2005 WL 3179711 (La. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter. This misconduct occurred in the same time frame as the misconduct forming the basis of respondent’s earlier disciplinary matter. Prior to the filing of new formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Gilda R. Small, Louisiana Bar Roll number 2114, be adjudged guilty of additional violations warranting discipline which may be considered in the event she applies for reinstatement from her suspension in In re: Small, 03-1736 (La.12/3/03), 863 So.2d 500, after becoming eligible to do so.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI