In re Small

915 So. 2d 353, 2005 La. LEXIS 2481, 2005 WL 3179711
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 29, 2005·No. No. 2005-B-1822·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter. This misconduct occurred in the same time frame as the misconduct forming the basis of respondent’s earlier disciplinary matter. Prior to the filing of new formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Gilda R. Small, Louisiana Bar Roll number 2114, be adjudged guilty of additional violations warranting discipline which may be considered in the event she applies for reinstatement from her suspension in In re: Small, 03-1736 (La.12/3/03), 863 So.2d 500, after becoming eligible to do so.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Small, 915 So. 2d 353, 2005 La. LEXIS 2481, 2005 WL 3179711 (La. 2005).

915 So. 2d 353 (In re Small) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Armond
46 So. 3d 667 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)
In re Appeal of Disciplinary Board Decision 03-PDB-085
936 So. 2d 810 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2006)