In Re S.M. - Concurring
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 7, 2004
IN RE S.M.
________________________
No. M2003-00422-COA-R3-PT - Filed January 15, 2004
WILLIAM B. CAIN , J., concurring.
I disagree with the standard of review employed by the court in this case for the reasons discussed at more length in In Re Z.J.S., No. M2002-02235-COA-R3-JV, 2003 WL 21266854, at *18-22 (Tenn.Ct.App. June 3, 2003) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed; Estate of Acuff v. O’Linger, 56 S.W.3d 527, 533-37 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2001). However, I would reach the same result employing the standard of review recited in Acuff v. O’Linger, 56 S.W.3d 527 at 537. Therefore, I concur with the court’s decision to reverse the order terminating R.G.L.’s parental rights.
__________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re S.M. - Concurring (In Re S.M. - Concurring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.