In Re S.M. - Concurring
This text of In Re S.M. - Concurring (In Re S.M. - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 7, 2004
IN RE S.M.
________________________
No. M2003-00422-COA-R3-PT - Filed January 15, 2004
WILLIAM B. CAIN , J., concurring.
I disagree with the standard of review employed by the court in this case for the reasons discussed at more length in In Re Z.J.S., No. M2002-02235-COA-R3-JV, 2003 WL 21266854, at *18-22 (Tenn.Ct.App. June 3, 2003) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed; Estate of Acuff v. O’Linger, 56 S.W.3d 527, 533-37 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2001). However, I would reach the same result employing the standard of review recited in Acuff v. O’Linger, 56 S.W.3d 527 at 537. Therefore, I concur with the court’s decision to reverse the order terminating R.G.L.’s parental rights.
__________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re S.M. - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sm-concurring-tennctapp-2004.