In re Slochowsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Slochowsky

12 A.D.2d 764, 210 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13565

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 764 (In re Slochowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Slochowsky, 12 A.D.2d 764, 210 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by suspended attorney, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement to the Bar, referred: (a) to the Committee on Character and Fitness of the Second Judicial District for investigation and report as to the applicant’s character and fitness and as to his activities and conduct since his suspension, and for the committee’s recommendation; and (b) to the District Attorney of Kings County, the petitioner in the prior disciplinary proceeding, for a statement with his comments and recommendation. The motion will be held in abeyance pending the filing of said report and statement. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by suspended attorney, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement to the Bar, referred: (a) to the Committee on Character and Fitness of the Second Judicial District for investigation and report as to the applicant’s character and fitness and as to his activities and conduct since his suspension, and for the committee’s recommendation; and (b) to the District Attorney of Kings County, the petitioner in the prior disciplinary proceeding, for a statement with his comments and recommendation. The motion will be held in abeyance pending the filing of said report and statement. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 764, 210 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-slochowsky-nyappdiv-1961.