In re Slay

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Slay

188 So. 3d 1049, 2016 La. LEXIS 850, 2016 WL 1423981

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 8, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-B-0437

StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 3d 1049 (In re Slay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Slay, 188 So. 3d 1049, 2016 La. LEXIS 850, 2016 WL 1423981 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent filed a pleading in a civil suit pending in Louisiana, although she is not licensed to practice law in this state, nor had she been admitted pro hac vice. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Heather Ree Slay be and she hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

KNOLL, J., dissents and would reject the joint petition for consent discipline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI