In re Slaughter

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Slaughter

211 Ill. 2d 657

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 2004

DocketMR 19480

StatusPublished

This text of 211 Ill. 2d 657 (In re Slaughter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Slaughter, 211 Ill. 2d 657 (Ill. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Chester Slaughter is suspended from the practice of law for five months. Suspension effective October 15, 2004.

Respondent Chester Slaughter shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Fitzgerald, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Chester Slaughter is suspended from the practice of law for five months. Suspension effective October 15, 2004.

Respondent Chester Slaughter shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Fitzgerald, J., took no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 Ill. 2d 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-slaughter-ill-2004.