In re Skyler S.M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Skyler S.M.

83 A.D.3d 549, 923 N.Y.S.2d 52

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 A.D.3d 549 (In re Skyler S.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Skyler S.M., 83 A.D.3d 549, 923 N.Y.S.2d 52 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about April 8, 2009, which, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, with respect to the disposition, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, without costs.

No appeal lies from the fact-finding part of the order, as it was entered upon the mother’s default (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Elijah Jose S. [Jose Angel S.], 79 AD3d 533, 533 [2010]). We reject the mother’s contention that counsel was ineffective for failing to move to vacate her default. The mother provides no explanation as to why she was unable to appear on the day of the fact-finding hearing, or why she did not notify the court or her counsel that she was unable to appear (see Matter of Nikeerah S. [Barbara S.], 69 AD3d 421, 422 [2010]).

In any event the finding of permanent neglect was supported by clear and convincing evidence of the mother’s failure to plan for the child’s future, notwithstanding the agency’s diligent efforts (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a], [f]). The mother admittedly tested positive for cocaine, failed to complete drug treatment and anger management programs, and did not obtain suitable housing.

[550]*550A preponderance of the evidence established that termination of the mother’s parental rights to facilitate adoption was in the child’s best interests (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]). The foster mother, with whom the child has lived since placement, wishes to adopt the child and has attended to the child’s medical and psychological needs (see Matter of Carol Anne Marie L. [Melissa L.], 74 AD3d 643, 644 [2010]). Since the child’s placement, the mother has tested positive for drugs and has refused to address the problems that led to placement. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about April 8, 2009, which, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, with respect to the disposition, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, without costs.

No appeal lies from the fact-finding part of the order, as it was entered upon the mother’s default (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Elijah Jose S. [Jose Angel S.], 79 AD3d 533, 533 [2010]). We reject the mother’s contention that counsel was ineffective for failing to move to vacate her default. The mother provides no explanation as to why she was unable to appear on the day of the fact-finding hearing, or why she did not notify the court or her counsel that she was unable to appear (see Matter of Nikeerah S. [Barbara S.], 69 AD3d 421, 422 [2010]).

In any event the finding of permanent neglect was supported by clear and convincing evidence of the mother’s failure to plan for the child’s future, notwithstanding the agency’s diligent efforts (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a], [f]). The mother admittedly tested positive for cocaine, failed to complete drug treatment and anger management programs, and did not obtain suitable housing.

[550]*550A preponderance of the evidence established that termination of the mother’s parental rights to facilitate adoption was in the child’s best interests (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]). The foster mother, with whom the child has lived since placement, wishes to adopt the child and has attended to the child’s medical and psychological needs (see Matter of Carol Anne Marie L. [Melissa L.], 74 AD3d 643, 644 [2010]). Since the child’s placement, the mother has tested positive for drugs and has refused to address the problems that led to placement. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.3d 549, 923 N.Y.S.2d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-skyler-sm-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack