In re Skokos

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Skokos

688 A.2d 1041, 147 N.J. 556, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 68

DecidedFebruary 26, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 688 A.2d 1041 (In re Skokos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Skokos, 688 A.2d 1041, 147 N.J. 556, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 68 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

[557]*557ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 19, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that NICHOLAS G. SKOKOS of ASBURY PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1 (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate) by failing to act promptly in concluding the sale of a restaurant business for his client, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NICHOLAS G. SKOKOS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[557]*557ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 19, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that NICHOLAS G. SKOKOS of ASBURY PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1 (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate) by failing to act promptly in concluding the sale of a restaurant business for his client, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NICHOLAS G. SKOKOS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

688 A.2d 1041, 147 N.J. 556, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-skokos-nj-1997.