In Re Skjonsby Truck Line, Inc.

39 B.R. 971, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5402
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota
DecidedJune 27, 1984
Docket14-30285
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 39 B.R. 971 (In Re Skjonsby Truck Line, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Skjonsby Truck Line, Inc., 39 B.R. 971, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5402 (N.D. 1984).

Opinion

ORDER

WILLIAM A. HILL, Bankruptcy Judge.

This Court entered an Order on May 31, 1984, fixing the claim of Job Service of North Dakota in the above-entitled bankruptcy proceeding at the sum of $9,566.35. A dispute remains between the parties as to whether the claim of Job Service of North Dakota is an unsecured or priority claim. Both parties have submitted their respective arguments on this matter by way of written brief.

DISCUSSION

Job Service maintains that their claim is a priority tax claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(6)(D). Section 507 of the Bankruptcy Code reads in part, as follows:

(a) The following expenses and claims have priority in the following order—
(6) Sixth, allowed unsecured claims of governmental units, to the extent that such claims are for—
(D) an employment tax on a wage, salary, or commission of a kind specified in paragraph (3) of this subsection earned from the debtor before the date of the filing of the petition, whether or not actually paid before such date-, for which a return is last due, under applicable law or under any extension, after three years before the date of the filing of the petition;

11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(6)(D). The Debtor argues that the contributions to the Job Service program are not in the nature of a tax, or that in the event the Court finds the contributions to be a tax, the contributions are not the type of tax contemplated under section 507(a)(6)(D) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Job Service of North Dakota was established pursuant to section 52-02-08 of the North Dakota Century Code for the purpose of administering the provisions of the North Dakota Unemployment Compensation Law. Job Service of North Dakota is directed to take appropriate steps to:

1. Reduce and prevent unemployment.
2. Encourage and assist in the adoption of practical methods of vocational training, retraining, and vocational guidance.
3. Investigate, recommend, advise, and assist in the establishment and operation, by municipalities, counties, school districts, and the state, of reserves for public works to be used in times of business depression and unemployment.
4. Promote the reemployment of unemployed workers throughout the state in every other way that may be feasible.
5. Carry on and publish the results of investigations and research studies.

N.D.Cent.Code § 52-02-08 (1982). In order to finance its activities, Job Service of North Dakota manages an unemployment compensation fund established pursuant to section 52-03-01 of the North Dakota Century Code. The unemployment compensation fund is composed in part of contributions from employers throughout the State of North Dakota. N.D.Cent.Code § 52-03-01 (1982). Section 52-04-01 of the North Dakota Century Code provides, in part, that “[contributions payable by each employer] shall become due and shall be paid by each employer to the bureau for the fund in accordance with such regulations as the bureau may prescribe, and shall not be deducted in whole or in part, from the wages of individuals and such employer’s employ ....” N.D.Cent.Code § 52-04-01 (1982). The Court must initially determine whether the contributions imposed upon employers under section 52-04-01 of the North Dakota Century Code are in the nature of tax obligations.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals listed the following characteristics of a tax obligation. In general, a tax is:

*973 (a) an involuntary pecuniary burden, regardless of name;
(b) imposed by or under the authority of the legislature;
(c) for public purposes;
(d) under the police or taxing power of the state.

In re Lorber Industries of California, Inc., 675 F.2d 1062, 1066 (9th Cir.1982). While the decision in Lorber Industries was rendered in a bankruptcy proceeding arising under the former Bankruptcy Act of 1898, that decision’s definition of a tax has been used by courts when construing section 507 of the Bankruptcy Code. See In re Payne, 27 B.R. 809 (Bkrtcy.D.Kan.1983); In re South Atlantic Packers Association, Inc., 28 B.R. 80 (Bkrtcy.D.S.C.1983). This Court believes that although the list of tax characteristics enumerated by the Court in Lorber Industries is helpful, that list does not exhaust the factors a court may consider when determining the nature of an alleged tax obligation.

The Debtor questions the tax characteristics of the obligation to Job Service in this instance on a number of grounds. First, the Debtor argues that the fund is established to benefit only a select group of individuals in the state, that being those who are employed by private businesses rather than the general local population. Further, the Debtor contends that the source of the obligation is based not upon the authorizing legislation, but comes about from the Debtor’s decision to engage in private business in this state and hire one or more employees. Finally, the Debt- or notes that the failure to make contributions to the unemployment compensation fund does not result in the filing of an automatic lien. 1 The remedy provided Job Service when an employer fails to make contributions to the unemployment compensation fund is to commence a civil action to collect the unpaid contributions. N.D.Cent. Code § 52-04-12 (1982). Section 52-04-13 of the North Dakota Century Code specifically distinguishes contributions to the unemployment compensation fund from taxes. Section 52-04-13 grants under a state adjudicated insolvency proceeding second priority standing to unpaid unemployment compensation contributions while unpaid taxes are given first priority status.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Albert Lindley Lee Memorial Hosp.
428 B.R. 283 (N.D. New York, 2010)
In re Albert Lindley Lee Memorial Hospital
428 B.R. 276 (N.D. New York, 2010)
In Re Cottage Grove Hospital
265 B.R. 241 (D. Oregon, 2001)
In Re Boston Regional Medical Center
256 B.R. 212 (D. Massachusetts, 2000)
Mueller v. Wisconsin (In Re Mueller)
243 B.R. 346 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1999)
Mounier v. United States (In Re Mounier)
232 B.R. 186 (S.D. California, 1998)
McConahey v. United States (In Re McConahey)
192 B.R. 187 (S.D. Illinois, 1996)
In Re Sacred Heart Hospital of Norristown
190 B.R. 38 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1995)
In Re Cassidy
983 F.2d 161 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)
In Re Continental Minerals Corp.
132 B.R. 757 (D. Nevada, 1991)
In Re Cassidy
126 B.R. 94 (D. Colorado, 1991)
Matter of Lackawanna Detective Agency, Inc.
82 B.R. 336 (D. Delaware, 1988)
Matter of Mansfield Tire & Rubber Co.
80 B.R. 395 (N.D. Ohio, 1987)
In Re O.P.M Leasing Services, Inc.
60 B.R. 679 (S.D. New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 B.R. 971, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-skjonsby-truck-line-inc-ndb-1984.