In re Skinner

477 N.E.2d 882, 1985 Ind. LEXIS 844
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 21, 1985
DocketNo. 684S230
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 477 N.E.2d 882 (In re Skinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Skinner, 477 N.E.2d 882, 1985 Ind. LEXIS 844 (Ind. 1985).

Opinion

ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND DISMISSING CAUSE AS MOOT

Comes now the Respondent, James W. Skinner, petitions for leave to resign from the Bar of this State, and tenders his Affidavit pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that Respondent's Affidavit meets the necessary elements set forth in Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 17. Accordingly, this Court accepts Respondent's resignation which is to be effective immediately.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that James W. Skinner is hereby removed as a member of the Bar of this State and that the Clerk of this Court remove his name from the roll of attorneys. It is further ordered that the Respondent must comply with the provisions of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4, in order to become eligible for reinstatement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of Respondent's resignation, this disciplinary cause is hereby dismissed as moot.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward Notice of this Order in accordance with the provisions of Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 3(d) governing disbarment and suspensions.

Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the Respondent.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Miller
681 N.E.2d 710 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 N.E.2d 882, 1985 Ind. LEXIS 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-skinner-ind-1985.