In re S.J.K.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re S.J.K.

848 N.E.2d 856, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1493

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 2006

Docket2006-0798

StatusPublished

This text of 848 N.E.2d 856 (In re S.J.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re S.J.K., 848 N.E.2d 856, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1493 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 22721, 2006-Ohio-653. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed April 3, 2006:

“Whether an assessment of points against a traffic offender’s record qualifies as a ‘collateral disability1 or a ‘loss of civil rights stemming from [the] conviction’ sufficient to demonstrate that the traffic offender continues to have a ‘substantial stake in the judgment of conviction’ even after paying the fines and costs also levied in the judgment of conviction.”

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. O’Connor, J., not participating.

The conflict cases are State v. Ingalls, Stark App. No. 2003CA00311, 2004-Ohio-3441; Cleveland v. Jennings (Feb. 17, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 76810; Westlake v. Connole (Sept. 2, 1999), Cuyahoga App. Nos. 74727 and 74910; State v. Brown (Sept. 26,1991), Mahoning App. No. 90 CA 107; and State v. Simmons (Dec. 26,1989), Pickaway App. No. 88CA8.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-0673, In re S.J.K., Summit App. No. 22721, 2006-Ohio-653.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI