In re Sissman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sissman

282 A.D.2d 925, 730 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8705

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 925 (In re Sissman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sissman, 282 A.D.2d 925, 730 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Per Curiam.

Motion by respondent for an order [926]*926terminating the six-month suspension imposed by this Court by memorandum and order entered July 18, 2000 (see, 274 AD2d 738).

Upon reading and filing the notice of motion and supporting affidavit dated March 21, 2001, submitted by respondent, and the reply affidavit dated March 26, 2001, submitted by petitioner advising that petitioner does not oppose respondent’s motion, it is hereby ordered that respondent’s motion is granted and the suspension period imposed by this Court’s memorandum and order entered July 18, 2000 is terminated, effective immediately.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Per Curiam.

Motion by respondent for an order [926]*926terminating the six-month suspension imposed by this Court by memorandum and order entered July 18, 2000 (see, 274 AD2d 738).

Upon reading and filing the notice of motion and supporting affidavit dated March 21, 2001, submitted by respondent, and the reply affidavit dated March 26, 2001, submitted by petitioner advising that petitioner does not oppose respondent’s motion, it is hereby ordered that respondent’s motion is granted and the suspension period imposed by this Court’s memorandum and order entered July 18, 2000 is terminated, effective immediately.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 925, 730 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sissman-nyappdiv-2001.