In re Sisk

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Sisk

631 S.E.2d 662, 280 Ga. 635, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1827, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 393

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 12, 2006

DocketS06Y1272

StatusPublished

This text of 631 S.E.2d 662 (In re Sisk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sisk, 631 S.E.2d 662, 280 Ga. 635, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1827, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 393 (Ga. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board which recommends that Respondent Kenneth Dennis Sisk be disbarred pursuant to Rule 9.4 (b) (1) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). This disciplinary action arises out of Sisk’s having consented to the August 31, 2005 revocation of his law license in the Commonwealth of Virginia as a disciplinary sanction for various instances of misconduct.

Because Sisk was personally served with the Notice of Reciprocal Discipline but did not object in any way, this Court hereby accepts the recommendation of the Review Panel and orders that Sisk be disbarred. Sisk is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board which recommends that Respondent Kenneth Dennis Sisk be disbarred pursuant to Rule 9.4 (b) (1) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d). This disciplinary action arises out of Sisk’s having consented to the August 31, 2005 revocation of his law license in the Commonwealth of Virginia as a disciplinary sanction for various instances of misconduct.

Because Sisk was personally served with the Notice of Reciprocal Discipline but did not object in any way, this Court hereby accepts the recommendation of the Review Panel and orders that Sisk be disbarred. Sisk is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

631 S.E.2d 662, 280 Ga. 635, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1827, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sisk-ga-2006.