In re Sirlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sirlin

291 A.D.2d 150, 739 N.Y.S.2d 289, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 150 (In re Sirlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sirlin, 291 A.D.2d 150, 739 N.Y.S.2d 289, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On November 5, 2001, the respondent pleaded guilty in the County Court, Nassau County, before the Honorable Donald E. [151]*151Belli, to the crime of grand larceny in the third degree, in violation of Penal Law § 155.35, a class D felony.

Having been convicted of a New York felony, the respondent was automatically disbarred at the time of bis plea, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4). The petitioner’s motion to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys is merely the formality of recording the existing fact of disbarment.

The respondent’s request that any order of this Court not be entered until March 31, 2002, to afford him time to wind down his practice is denied.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Santucci, Altman and Townes, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Kenneth Sirlin, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see, 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Kenneth Sirlin is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI