In re Sipes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Sipes

478 S.E.2d 279, 324 S.C. 199, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 205

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 8, 1996·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The above-named filed a Petition on July 3, 1996, seeking reinstatement to the practice of law in the State of South Carolina. Petitioner was suspended from the practice of law in 1989.

Following an investigation, the Petitioner received a unanimous endorsement of the Committee on Character and Fitness. After careful consideration, it is hereby ordered that Marlene T. Sipes is reinstated as a member of the South Carolina Bar.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal, A.J. /s/ James E. Moore, A.J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr., A.J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The above-named filed a Petition on July 3, 1996, seeking reinstatement to the practice of law in the State of South Carolina. Petitioner was suspended from the practice of law in 1989.

Following an investigation, the Petitioner received a unanimous endorsement of the Committee on Character and Fitness. After careful consideration, it is hereby ordered that Marlene T. Sipes is reinstated as a member of the South Carolina Bar.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal, A.J. /s/ James E. Moore, A.J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr., A.J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, A.J.

In re Sipes, 478 S.E.2d 279, 324 S.C. 199, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 205 (S.C. 1996).

Pincite

478 S.E.2d 279 (In re Sipes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.