In re Singer

46 A.3d 550, 210 N.J. 554, 2012 WL 2680576, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 686
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJuly 5, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.3d 550 (In re Singer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Singer, 46 A.3d 550, 210 N.J. 554, 2012 WL 2680576, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 686 (N.J. 2012).

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decisions in DRB 10-033 and DRB 11-387, concluding that CLIFFORD B. SINGER of WALDWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be disciplined for the unethical conduct established in said matters, consisting of violations of RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to adequately communicate with the client), RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client trust funds), RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and RPC 8.4(e) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having concluded that a censure should be imposed for the totality of respondent’s unethical conduct established in DRB 10-033 and DRB 11-387;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to continue to practice law under supervision;

[555]*555And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CLIFFORD B. SINGER is hereby censured for the unethical conduct found in DRB 10-033 and DRB 11-387; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue to practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.3d 550, 210 N.J. 554, 2012 WL 2680576, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-singer-nj-2012.