In re Simone-Kiesha Mc.
This text of 101 A.D.3d 635 (In re Simone-Kiesha Mc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that despite the agency’s diligent efforts, respondent failed to plan for the children’s future (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). Although respondent was required to complete a drug treatment program and the agency provided referrals and sought to follow up, respondent failed to complete a program (see Matter of Jada Dorithah Solay McC. [Crystal Delores McC.], 95 AD3d 615 [1st Dept 2012]; Matter of Alfonso D., 12 AD3d 258, 259 [1st Dept 2004]).
[636]*636A preponderance of the evidence supports the determination that the children’s best interests would be served by terminating respondent’s parental rights and freeing the children for adoption (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]). Respondent still had not completed a drug treatment program by the time of disposition. Meanwhile, the children have lived in the same preadoptive foster home with their other siblings for over four years. In addition, the foster parents, who wish to adopt the children, have been tending to the children’s special needs, and the children have been thriving in their care. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Richter and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D.3d 635, 955 N.Y.2d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-simone-kiesha-mc-nyappdiv-2012.