In re Simon II Litigation

208 F.R.D. 487, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12818, 2002 WL 1531295
District Court, E.D. New York·Decided June 17, 2002·No. Nos. 00-CV-5332, 98-CV-0675, 98-CV-1492, 98-CV-3287, 99-CV-1988, 99-CV-6142, 00-CV-2340, 00-CV-4442, 02-CV-0599, 02-CV-4632·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (MASON)

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.

In reviewing the docket sheets and memo-randa in James Mason v. The American Tobacco Co., 00-CV-4442, I find papers on a stay, severance, transfer and certification, but no formal motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. If the parties wish to make a motion to dismiss, or a motion for summary judgment, or to renew a motion made in another venue, the motion should be made or renewed promptly so that the viability of the plaintiffs’ theory can be addressed directly when next we meet. My recollection is that the validity of the theory of plaintiffs’ case as an individual or class action pursuant to sections 1395y(b)(3)(A) and 2651 of title 42 of the United States Code, see, e.g., Third Amended Class Action Complaint, Prayer for Relief H17, has been adverted to in courtroom discussions.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Simon II Litigation, 208 F.R.D. 487, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12818, 2002 WL 1531295 (E.D.N.Y. 2002).

208 F.R.D. 487 (In re Simon II Litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Simon II Litigation
211 F.R.D. 86 (E.D. New York, 2002)