In re Simon
This text of 73 A.3d 107 (In re Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having found by clear and convincing evidence that respondent, Lennox J. Simon, violated District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1(b), 1.3(a), 1.3(c), 1.15(a), and 8.4(d), inter alia by recklessly misappropriating funds entrusted to him as the court-appointed conservator of the estate of an incapacitated individual, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be disbarred. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has filed an exception to the Board’s recommendation.
Pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9(h)(2), “if no exceptions are filed to the Board’s report, the court will enter an order imposing the discipline recommended by the Board upon expiration of the time permitted for filing exceptions.” Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Lennox J. Simon be disbarred from the District of Columbia Bar, effective as of the date of this order.1 For purposes of reinstatement, the period of respondent’s disbarment shall run from the date on which he files the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). We direct respondent’s attention to the responsibilities of disbarred attorneys set forth in D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 A.3d 107, 2013 WL 3940823, 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-simon-dc-2013.