In re Simmons

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 319
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1960
DocketNo. 36151
StatusPublished

This text of 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 319 (In re Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Simmons, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 319 (Ohio 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had and exercised an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peoic, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-simmons-ohio-1960.