In re Simmons
This text of 112 A.D.2d 806 (In re Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term exercised sound discretion when it denied petitioner’s request to enter respondent hospital’s intensive-care unit with personnel and camera equipment and remain there for a period of eight hours for the purpose of videotaping his daughter, who is comatose and clinically brain dead.
Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the filming is material or necessary to a prospective action for personal injury or wrongful death.
All concur, except Doerr, J. P., and Pine, J., who dissent and vote to reverse and grant the application, in accordance with the following memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D.2d 806, 492 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-simmons-nyappdiv-1985.