In re Silverman

97 F. 325, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedNovember 3, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 F. 325 (In re Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Silverman, 97 F. 325, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge.

There being no answer interposed by the bankrupt to the involuntary petition, and the attorney’s special duties for the petitioning creditors ending with the first meeting of creditors, when a trustee was chosen, the sum of $75 will be a [326]*326sufficient “attorney’s fee” in this case under section 64b, subd. 3, allowance being made for the delays and the trouble in getting schedules filed. The affidavits do not show any special benefits by attorney or counsel in the collection of assets, beyond obtaining the ordinary stay of proceedings. In re J. W. Harrison Mercantile Co., 95 Fed. 123.

After the appointment of a trustee, no allowance to petitioning creditors can be made for attorney or counsel on examinations of the bankrupt, such services being either for tlie trustee or the creditors individually.

The filing fee of $25 and marshal’s charges of $8.48 should also be repaid. The other disbursements are disallowed on this application. The indemnity deposit will be returned by the referee and charged to the trustee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Poe
1 F. Supp. 658 (S.D. New York, 1932)
In re Felson
139 F. 275 (N.D. New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 F. 325, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-silverman-nysd-1899.