In re Silverberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Silverberg

663 A.2d 638, 142 N.J. 428, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1176

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 13, 1995·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on July 11, 1995, recommending that MARK V. SILVER-BERG of EAST BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 8.4(c) (misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK V. SILVERBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on July 11, 1995, recommending that MARK V. SILVER-BERG of EAST BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 8.4(c) (misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK V. SILVERBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Silverberg, 663 A.2d 638, 142 N.J. 428, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1176 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

663 A.2d 638 (In re Silverberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.