Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Siegfried

In re Siegfried

265 A.D. 964, 38 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6763
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 A.D. 964 (In re Siegfried) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Siegfried, 265 A.D. 964, 38 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

(Vide Matter of Davis, 252 App. Div.. 591; Matter of Salus, 321 Penn. St. 106.) No other wrongdoing has been charged against the respondent. The court cannot agree with the recommendation of the learned official referee that discipline be limited to censure but decides that the offense requires a suspension from the practice of the law for a period of six months. Respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of six months. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Abrams
266 A.2d 275 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 964, 38 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-siegfried-nyappdiv-1942.