In re Siegfried
265 A.D. 964, 38 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6763
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
(Vide Matter of Davis, 252 App. Div.. 591; Matter of Salus, 321 Penn. St. 106.) No other wrongdoing has been charged against the respondent. The court cannot agree with the recommendation of the learned official referee that discipline be limited to censure but decides that the offense requires a suspension from the practice of the law for a period of six months. Respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of six months. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Siegfried, 265 A.D. 964, 38 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 964 (In re Siegfried) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Abrams
266 A.2d 275 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1970)