In re Siegel

274 A.D. 297, 83 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3064
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On November 7,1947, after a trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, the respondent was convicted of a violation of section 91 of title 18 of the United States Code (attempting to bribe a United States officer). That crime is a felony and on November 10, 1947, the respondent was sentenced to twenty months imprisonment and fined $1,910. Thereafter and on [298]*298April 7, 1948, an order was signed by the Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, dismissing the appeal taken by the respondent. Under the Penal Law of this State the crime of attempting to bribe a public officer is a felony (Penal Law, §§ 261, 378).- Pursuant to the provisions of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, having been convicted of a felony, should be disbarred (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4).

The respondent should be disbarred.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Siegel, 274 A.D. 297, 83 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

274 A.D. 297 (In re Siegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Barash
30 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)