In re Siegel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Siegel

744 A.2d 648, 162 N.J. 360, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 350

DecidedFebruary 8, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 744 A.2d 648 (In re Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Siegel, 744 A.2d 648, 162 N.J. 360, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 350 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that DANIEL SIEGEL, formerly of ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1952, and who thereafter was suspended from practice for a period of three years, retroactive to November 8, 1993, and until reinstated to practice in New York, by Order of this Court dated February 15, 1995, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that DANIEL SIEGEL, formerly of ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1952, and who thereafter was suspended from practice for a period of three years, retroactive to November 8, 1993, and until reinstated to practice in New York, by Order of this Court dated February 15, 1995, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

744 A.2d 648, 162 N.J. 360, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-siegel-nj-2000.