In re Sidorik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sidorik

249 A.D. 647, 291 N.Y.S. 204, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5379

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 647 (In re Sidorik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sidorik, 249 A.D. 647, 291 N.Y.S. 204, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action pending between Michael SuM, plaintiff, and Stephen Sidorik, defendant, subsequently declared to be an incompetent, order denying plaintiff’s motion in such action for leave to continue the action against the defend’ant as an incompetent and to make the committee of the incompetent a party defendant, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Even assuming that plaintiff has unreasonably delayed in making the motion, it does not appear that the delay has prejudiced the incompetent or the committee. Young, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action pending between Michael SuM, plaintiff, and Stephen Sidorik, defendant, subsequently declared to be an incompetent, order denying plaintiff’s motion in such action for leave to continue the action against the defend’ant as an incompetent and to make the committee of the incompetent a party defendant, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Even assuming that plaintiff has unreasonably delayed in making the motion, it does not appear that the delay has prejudiced the incompetent or the committee. Young, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 647, 291 N.Y.S. 204, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sidorik-nyappdiv-1936.