In re Sickmen

100 A.D.2d 607, 473 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17590
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 23, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 607 (In re Sickmen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Sickmen, 100 A.D.2d 607, 473 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Proceeding, pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4) by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District (1) to suspend the respondent Russell T. Sickmen, an attorney admitted to practice by this court on March 6, 1974, immediately from the practice of law based upon his conviction of a “serious crime”, (2) to authorize the petitioner to commence a proceeding to discipline respondent for the professional misconduct of said attorney in connection with his conviction upon a plea of guilty in the United States District Court, for the Southern District of New York, on November 14,1983, of conspiracy to commit mail fraud (US Code, tit 18, § 371) and upon any other charges of professional misconduct by said attorney which may come to the committee’s attention. K Application granted. U The respondent, Russell T. Sickmen, shall remain suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this court. The petitioner Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District is authorized to commence the proceeding. The issues raised by the petition and the answer are referred to Alfred Besunder, Esq., 70 Forestdale Road, Rockville Centre, New York, 11570, as Special Referee, to hear and to report, with his findings upon each of the issues. I Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, 158 Third Street, Mineola, New York, 11501, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in this proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sears Mortgage Corp. v. Rose
634 A.2d 74 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1993)
First Interregional Equity Corp. v. Haughton
805 F. Supp. 196 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Southland Corp. v. Bukhari
748 F. Supp. 988 (E.D. New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.2d 607, 473 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sickmen-nyappdiv-1984.