In re Siben

15 A.D.2d 665, 223 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895

This text of 15 A.D.2d 665 (In re Siben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Siben, 15 A.D.2d 665, 223 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

[666]*666It is our opinion, however, that for such professional misconduct the respondent should be suspended from practice for a period of six months. Accordingly, the respective motions are granted to the extent indicated, and otherwise denied; the Referee’s report is confirmed to the extent indicated and disaffirmed to the extent indicated; and respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of six months, commencing 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Hill, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 665, 223 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-siben-nyappdiv-1962.