In re Siben

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Siben

15 A.D.2d 665, 223 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 22, 1962·Published

Opinion

[666]*666It is our opinion, however, that for such professional misconduct the respondent should be suspended from practice for a period of six months. Accordingly, the respective motions are granted to the extent indicated, and otherwise denied; the Referee’s report is confirmed to the extent indicated and disaffirmed to the extent indicated; and respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of six months, commencing 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Hill, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[666]*666It is our opinion, however, that for such professional misconduct the respondent should be suspended from practice for a period of six months. Accordingly, the respective motions are granted to the extent indicated, and otherwise denied; the Referee’s report is confirmed to the extent indicated and disaffirmed to the extent indicated; and respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of six months, commencing 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Hill, J., not voting.

In re Siben, 15 A.D.2d 665, 223 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

15 A.D.2d 665 (In re Siben) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.