In Re Shutt

200 S.E. 372, 214 N.C. 684, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 410
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 4, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 S.E. 372 (In Re Shutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Shutt, 200 S.E. 372, 214 N.C. 684, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 410 (N.C. 1939).

Opinion

Stacy, 0. J.

Tbe proceeding has at least tbe merit of novelty. Tbe clerk thought be was acting under C. S., 99. Tbe judge held that tbe clerk bad no authority in tbe premises, if indeed tbe proceeding may properly be styled a judicial one, which may be doubted. This ruling, which is unchallenged, vacated tbe supposed reference and put an end to tbe matter, notwithstanding tbe broad jurisdiction of tbe Superior Court under C. S., 637. Tbe administratrix expressed no doubt as to tbe justness of tbe claims presented, but simply said as a matter of propriety she was in no position to admit them. This falls short of a proper predicate for tbe determination of tbe claims.

We were informed on tbe argument that claimant has lately resigned as administratrix of her husband’s estate and that another has been appointed in her stead. Tbe new representative has not been made a party to this proceeding. No doubt tbe matter will now be adjusted in some approved way.

Proceeding dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Administration of the Estate of Reynolds
20 S.E.2d 348 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 S.E. 372, 214 N.C. 684, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shutt-nc-1939.