in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 8, 2005
Docket14-05-00657-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D (in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2005

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00657-CV

IN RE SHREENATH V. DOCTOR, M.D., Ph.D, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On July 1, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In his petition, relator seeks to have this court compel the Honorable James D. Squier, presiding judge of the 312th District Court in Harris County, to set aside his order signed June 24, 2005, requiring production of allegedly privileged documents, entered in cause number 2003-66189, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Cami Lynette Melcher and Marc Carroll Melcher and in the Interest of D.L.M. and L.M.M., minor children. 

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief.  Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2005.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson and Hudson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shreenath-v-doctor-md-phd-texapp-2005.