in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D
This text of in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D (in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00657-CV
IN RE SHREENATH V. DOCTOR, M.D., Ph.D, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On July 1, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator seeks to have this court compel the Honorable James D. Squier, presiding judge of the 312th District Court in Harris County, to set aside his order signed June 24, 2005, requiring production of allegedly privileged documents, entered in cause number 2003-66189, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Cami Lynette Melcher and Marc Carroll Melcher and in the Interest of D.L.M. and L.M.M., minor children.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson and Hudson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Shreenath v. Doctor, M.D., PH.D, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shreenath-v-doctor-md-phd-texapp-2005.