In re Shockley
40 A. 113, 17 Del. 273, 1 Penne. 273, 1898 Del. LEXIS 20
This text of 40 A. 113 (In re Shockley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Shockley, 40 A. 113, 17 Del. 273, 1 Penne. 273, 1898 Del. LEXIS 20 (Del. Ct. App. 1898).
Opinion
The Court held that the money could not be paid in, as the petition was only that of the owner of the equity of redemption in the mortgaged premises and because the persons entitled to the principal and interest in the mortgage had not joined in the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 A. 113, 17 Del. 273, 1 Penne. 273, 1898 Del. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shockley-delsuperct-1898.