In re Shira L.

100 A.D.3d 998, 954 N.Y.S.2d 461

This text of 100 A.D.3d 998 (In re Shira L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Shira L., 100 A.D.3d 998, 954 N.Y.S.2d 461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

In related custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, by permission, from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated March 20, 2012, which awarded the father temporary unsupervised visitation with the parties’ son Azriel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the father temporary unsupervised visitation with the parties’ son Azriel. Its determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Boggio v Boggio, 96 AD3d 834 [2012]; Matter of DeSimone v Delano, 94 AD3d [999]*999759 [2012]; Matter of Crowder v Austin, 90 AD3d 753 [2011]). The Family Court possessed adequate relevant information to enable it to make an informed and provident determination with respect to the best interests of that child and, therefore, an evidentiary hearing was not necessary to render a temporary visitation determination (see Matter of Donovan C., 65 AD3d 1041 [2009]; Bibas v Bibas, 62 AD3d 924 [2009]; McAvoy v Hannigan, 41 AD3d 791 [2007]; Assini v Assini, 11 AD3d 417 [2004]; Matter of Levande v Levande, 10 AD3d 723 [2004]). Florio, J.E, Leventhal, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levande v. Levande
10 A.D.3d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Assini v. Assini
11 A.D.3d 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
McAvoy v. Hannigan
41 A.D.3d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Bibas v. Bibas
62 A.D.3d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Donovan C. Administration for Children's Services
65 A.D.3d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Crowder v. Austin
90 A.D.3d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
DeSimone v. Delano
94 A.D.3d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Boggio v. Boggio
96 A.D.3d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.3d 998, 954 N.Y.S.2d 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shira-l-nyappdiv-2012.