In re Shipley
135 S. Ct. 1589, 191 L. Ed. 2d 670, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1883
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 23, 2015
DocketNo. D–2827.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 135 S. Ct. 1589 (In re Shipley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Shipley, 135 S. Ct. 1589, 191 L. Ed. 2d 670, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1883 (U.S. 2015).
Opinion
A response having been filed, the Order to Show Cause dated December 8, 2014, is discharged. All Members of the Bar are reminded, however, that they are responsible-as Officers of the Court-for compliance with the requirement of Supreme Court Rule 14.3 that petitions for writs of certiorari be stated "in plain terms," and *1590may not delegate that responsibility to the client.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Deforte v. Borough of Worthington
364 F. Supp. 3d 458 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2019)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 1589, 191 L. Ed. 2d 670, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shipley-scotus-2015.