In Re Shinohara
This text of In Re Shinohara (In Re Shinohara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE HISATO SHINOHARA AND AKIRA SUGAWARA ____________________
2011-1226 (Serial No. 08/169,127) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ERIC J. ROBINSON, Robinson Intellectual Property Law Offices, P.C., of Fairfax, Virginia, for appellant. With him on the brief was SEAN C. FLOOD.
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associated Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and DYK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Shinohara, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shinohara-cafc-2011.