In re Shevona P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shevona P.

295 A.D.2d 258, 743 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6892

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 258 (In re Shevona P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shevona P., 295 A.D.2d 258, 743 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about December 21, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed her with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s placement of appellant was the least restrictive alternative placement consistent with her needs (see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947), based on factors such as appellant’s record of truancy, the previous PINS petition; appellant’s rejection from the Juvenile Intensive Supervision Program, and the psychiatric recommendation for placement outside of the community with close supervision. Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Ellerin, Rubin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about December 21, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed her with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s placement of appellant was the least restrictive alternative placement consistent with her needs (see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947), based on factors such as appellant’s record of truancy, the previous PINS petition; appellant’s rejection from the Juvenile Intensive Supervision Program, and the psychiatric recommendation for placement outside of the community with close supervision. Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Ellerin, Rubin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 258, 743 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shevona-p-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack