In re Shertee C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shertee C.

278 A.D.2d 178, 718 N.Y.S.2d 178, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 178 (In re Shertee C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shertee C., 278 A.D.2d 178, 718 N.Y.S.2d 178, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about April 23, 1997, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child and committing her custody and guardianship to petitioners agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence of respondent’s failure to complete any of the many drug rehabilitation programs to which she was referred by the agency, or remain drug free (see, Matter of Tanya Alexis G., 273 AD2d 19). The agency properly aimed its diligent efforts at respondent’s drug addiction (see, Matter of Michael M., 172 AD2d 152). The child’s best interests would be served by freeing her for adoption by her foster parents. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about April 23, 1997, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child and committing her custody and guardianship to petitioners agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence of respondent’s failure to complete any of the many drug rehabilitation programs to which she was referred by the agency, or remain drug free (see, Matter of Tanya Alexis G., 273 AD2d 19). The agency properly aimed its diligent efforts at respondent’s drug addiction (see, Matter of Michael M., 172 AD2d 152). The child’s best interests would be served by freeing her for adoption by her foster parents. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 178, 718 N.Y.S.2d 178, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shertee-c-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack