In re Sherrod B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sherrod B.

275 A.D.2d 665, 713 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10018

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 665 (In re Sherrod B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sherrod B., 275 A.D.2d 665, 713 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), [666]*666entered on or about October 27, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 24 months with counseling and community service, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the serious nature of appellant’s unlawful conduct as well as his lack of insight into his multiple criminal acts and their impact on the victim, the court properly placed appellant on probation with counseling and community service. This disposition was the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the needs of the community (see, Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]). The court properly relied upon evaluations by a psychiatrist and a probation officer as to the need for probation and treatment. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Ellerin, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), [666]*666entered on or about October 27, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 24 months with counseling and community service, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the serious nature of appellant’s unlawful conduct as well as his lack of insight into his multiple criminal acts and their impact on the victim, the court properly placed appellant on probation with counseling and community service. This disposition was the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the needs of the community (see, Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]). The court properly relied upon evaluations by a psychiatrist and a probation officer as to the need for probation and treatment. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Ellerin, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 665, 713 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sherrod-b-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack