In re Sherlock v. Grigsby

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Sherlock v. Grigsby

167 A.3d 551, 2017 WL 3568392, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 220

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 17, 2017

Docket16-BG-1069

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.3d 551 (In re Sherlock v. Grigsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sherlock v. Grigsby, 167 A.3d 551, 2017 WL 3568392, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 220 (D.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent engaged in intentional misappropriation and recommends that the-respondent be disbarred. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has excepted to that conclusion and recommendation. We therefore accept the Board’s recommendation. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (h)(2).

Accordingly, it-is ORDERED that respondent Sherlock V. Grigsby is' hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. For purposes of reinstatement, the period of disbarment will begin to run when Mr. Grigsby has filed an affidavit demonstrating full compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent engaged in intentional misappropriation and recommends that the-respondent be disbarred. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has excepted to that conclusion and recommendation. We therefore accept the Board’s recommendation. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (h)(2).

Accordingly, it-is ORDERED that respondent Sherlock V. Grigsby is' hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. For purposes of reinstatement, the period of disbarment will begin to run when Mr. Grigsby has filed an affidavit demonstrating full compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.3d 551, 2017 WL 3568392, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sherlock-v-grigsby-dc-2017.