In re Sherila D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sherila D.

43 A.D.2d 954, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 954 (In re Sherila D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sherila D., 43 A.D.2d 954, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 1973, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed her on probation. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed. The Corporation Counsel candidly admits that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant had committed acts which, if done by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery. We agree and commend the Corporation Counsel for his forthrightness. Accordingly, the order should be reversed and the petition dismissed. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 1973, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed her on probation. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed. The Corporation Counsel candidly admits that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant had committed acts which, if done by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery. We agree and commend the Corporation Counsel for his forthrightness. Accordingly, the order should be reversed and the petition dismissed. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 954, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sherila-d-nyappdiv-1974.