In re Sheriff

268 A.D. 771, 50 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3396

Opinion

Order modified by eliminating therefrom the restriction limiting the examination to the period subsequent to January 12, 1939, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioner-appellant. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents in the following memorandum in which Untermyer, J., concurs: There is an issue of fact as to whether a demand to inspect the books of the corporation was ever refused. Accordingly, the final order herein should not have been granted. The matter should be remitted to the Special Term for a determination of that question before the issuance of a peremptory order. (Matter of Wong Wah Yew v. Mun Hey Pub. Co., 275 N. Y. 615; Matter of Ellsworth, Barrows & Co. v. Ward, 255 App. Div. 91.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sheriff, 268 A.D. 771, 50 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 771 (In re Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Yew v. Mun Hey Publishing Co., Inc.
11 N.E.2d 783 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Ellsworth, Barrows & Co. v. Ward
255 A.D. 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)